Home
 
  click here to subscribe  
 
< Previous Story
 
 

Tips on Voice Recording

Round 1: Trunk-side recording vs. Extension-side recording

Up there with life's monumental dilemmas comes voice recordings very own, Trunk-side recording vs. Extension-side, which one is right for your organisation?

Both are well-established and mature offerings with hundreds of thousands of channels deployed globally. The following matrix highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each offering: -

 
Author: Scott Miller, Manager
of Professional Services
   

 

Trunk-side

Extension-side

Infrastructure costs (cabling)

Low

High

Management of recording changes (physical)

Low

High

System Administration

Low

Low

Complexity

Medium

Low

Inherent resiliency

Good

Excellent

Small scale Solution cost (low channel count)

High

Low

Enterprise scale Solution cost (high channel count)

Medium

High

Recording channels per Logger

High

Medium

Detailed call information

Yes

No (Yes if integration with the switch)

Record internal calls

No

Yes

In general the larger the recording requirement the higher the costs will be for extension-side recording. The management costs also increase. The Achilles heel for the trunk-side offering is its inability to record internal calls.

Small recording solutions invariably opt for extension-side recording, as the cost of a trunk-side recording solution at this level is prohibitive. Remember that in most instances recording trunk-side requires integration with the switch to provide call information. This is necessary in order to determine which trunk an extension utilised in order to facilitate the search and replay of calls.

As illustrated above, there are a sufficient number of differentiators between the two offerings for a clear, informed decision to be made.

If only choosing a takeaway was that easy, Indian or Chinese, hmmm?

 

 
 
 
 
 


Sales:
0800 458 2988


Switchboard:
020 8326 8200

 
 
 
Click here to visit Opex Hosting Ltd